Skill Locker
All skills
v1.3.03 loop iterations

Anti-Commoditisation Positioning

Every agency owner has heard 'why should I pay you when I can use ChatGPT?' Most fumble the answer because they haven't done the thinking. The Anti-Commoditisation Positioning skill builds the honest counter-argument — what AI genuinely can't do in your specific work, and how to say so without sounding either dismissive or panicked.

What this skill does

Anti-commoditisation isn't a defensive crouch. The agencies that survive AI-driven price compression are the ones that did the honest thinking about what they actually do, admitted which parts AI can do well, and built the positioning around the parts that matter most — judgment, context, accountability, and narrative. The skill produces both the internal conviction and the external messaging, because one without the other doesn't hold under pressure.

The HUMAN framework maps the irreplaceable layer across five dimensions. High-stakes judgment (AI generates options, humans decide between them with consequences). Understanding context that isn't in the data (internal politics, board dynamics, brand history, what the client told you on a call that's not in any brief). Managing the unpredictable (crisis response, algorithm changes, real-time strategy adaptation). Accountability and ownership (someone to call when it matters, someone with legal and ethical responsibility, someone who cares about your outcome rather than the statistically average one). Narrative and relationship (long-term brand coherence and the trust built over years).

Every element has to land with a specific example from the user's actual work — generic illustrations don't survive a procurement review. "We provide strategic guidance" is a claim anyone can make; "we talked the client out of a £30K campaign last quarter because we knew their CFO was about to cut Q3" is irrefutable. The skill refuses to ship the generic version and pushes the user to find the specific moment, even when it feels uncomfortable to claim publicly.

Objection responses use an Acknowledge-Counter-Evidence structure for the four objections every agency now hears: "why pay you when AI can do this", "my intern can use ChatGPT for half the cost", "AI is getting better, won't it replace you", and "your competitor offers the same service for 40% less using AI." None of the responses dismiss AI — saying AI can't do what you do makes you sound out of touch. The strategy is the opposite: name where AI now does the production well, then show why the remaining layer is what the buyer is actually paying for. The skill closes by listing where the agency should be using AI openly, because the most credible anti-commoditisation argument comes from someone who uses the tool well.

When this triggers

  • ·A prospect has explicitly compared your fees to running ChatGPT themselves
  • ·You're losing deals to AI-powered competitors offering similar deliverables at half the price
  • ·Your team needs internal conviction about why the work still matters before they can sell it
  • ·You want to reposition from 'we do X' to 'we ensure Y outcome' but don't have the language yet
  • ·You're using AI internally and need to figure out how to disclose that without undermining your premium

Example

Trigger

User: 'Lost a £40K project last week to an agency using AI workflows at £18K. Both proposals looked similar on paper. How do we respond next time?'

Output

The 5 things AI couldn't do in that deal (HUMAN framework): H — Judgment: AI generates options. You make the call that, eg, the client's German launch needs different creative than the UK one because of a brand-history issue the AI doesn't know about. U — Context not in the data: client's CFO is about to cut Q3, their competitor just filed for bankruptcy, their CEO has a specific dislike. Your call notes have this. The model doesn't. M — Managing the unpredictable: when their competitor surprise- launched in March, you replanned Q2 in 48 hours. Cite the specific instance. A — Accountability: someone to call at 11pm when it goes wrong. The £18K agency is one prompt deep on every problem. N — Narrative: brand voice built over 3 years. AI can mimic it. You created it. Objection response (ACE) for next time: Acknowledge: "You're right — AI has changed what's possible at this price point." Counter: "The question isn't whether AI can produce content. It's whether it can produce the RIGHT content when your [specific situation] changes." Evidence: cite the German launch judgment call above. Repositioned proposition: from "we deliver content" to "we own the outcome of conversion campaigns and the decisions that protect them" — pricing follows.

Get this skill + 15 more

Included in the The Agency Owner Stack — scale delivery without scaling headcount. Save $130+ vs buying individually.

Get The Agency Owner Stack — $149

What you get

  • 139-line SKILL.md, ready to drop into ~/.claude/skills/
  • Tested through 3 Karpathy-loop iterations (versions v1.0.0 → v1.3.0)
  • Triggers automatically when relevant — no command to remember
  • Lifetime updates as the skill is refined further

More from Agency Operations

Browse the full library

297 skills across 31 categories. One purchase, lifetime updates.

See all bundles