Tool Picker
'Try both and see what works' is useless advice. The Tool Picker gives you a direct recommendation — which AI tool, why this one, how to start, and the one limitation to watch for — based on real capability differences instead of hype.
What this skill does
"It depends" is the default answer to AI tool questions and it's the wrong one. People asking which tool to use have limited time and want a starting point that isn't a hedge. This skill gives one — opinionated, grounded in actual capability differences, not brand loyalty. The user can disagree with the recommendation, but they get an answer they can act on instead of a paragraph that ends in "try them and see."
The tool landscape is broken down by what each is genuinely best at and what it's weak at: Claude for long context, reasoning, and nuanced writing; Claude Code for in-codebase work with file access; ChatGPT for image generation, voice, and broad plugins; Perplexity for cited research and recent information; Cursor for IDE-integrated editing with visual diffs; Copilot for line-by-line completion; Midjourney, DALL-E, and Flux for images at different tradeoffs; Gemini for Google Workspace and video. Pricing tiers move constantly — recommendations are based on capability, with a note to check current pricing rather than baking it in.
The chat-vs-API distinction is treated as a first-class question, because most users don't realise it. If the task is interactive and one-off, the chat interface is correct. If it's batch processing, automation, or product integration, the API is correct — and "Claude" is not the same recommendation as "Claude API." Volume jobs in a chat window are a common failure mode the skill catches early.
It's honest about the tradeoff of "one tool for everything": one tool will cover about 70% of needs well; the other 30% will be noticeably weaker than a specialist. The skill names the right primary tool by use case (coding, research, writing, visual, Google ecosystem) instead of pretending one tool is universal. It also handles pushback gracefully — when a user has strong tool loyalty, the skill doesn't argue; it gives one concrete example where a different tool measurably outperforms for the stated task, then respects their choice if they stick. The best tool is the one they'll actually use.
When this triggers
- ·You're deciding between Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini for a specific task
- ·You're paying for three AI subscriptions and not sure which is doing the work
- ·You're about to use a chat tool for a job that actually needs the API
- ·You want one tool for everything and need to know which 30% you'll be giving up
- ·Someone on your team uses ChatGPT for code and you suspect it's the wrong choice
Example
Trigger
User: 'I need to process 500 customer support emails and extract sentiment + key themes. Which AI tool?'
Output
Not a chat tool — this is a volume job. Claude API, not Claude.ai. Why: chat interfaces are for interactive iteration. 500 items pasted one-by-one will burn a day and produce inconsistent output. The API runs them in a batch with the same prompt template against each. How to start: 1. Get an Anthropic API key (console.anthropic.com) 2. Use the Messages API with a prompt template: "Extract sentiment (positive/neutral/negative) and top 3 themes from this email. Return JSON." 3. Loop over your 500 emails, store JSON results to a file 4. Aggregate themes in a second pass Watch out for: rate limits and cost on 500 calls. Estimate tokens first; for this size you're looking at single-digit dollars, but check before you point it at 50,000. If you wanted to stay in chat: Claude.ai handles maybe 20-30 items in one window before the output quality degrades. Past that, API.
Get this skill + 15 more
Included in the The Solopreneur Stack — run a one-person empire. Save $110+ vs buying individually.
Get The Solopreneur Stack — $129What you get
- 102-line SKILL.md, ready to drop into ~/.claude/skills/
- Tested through 3 Karpathy-loop iterations (versions v1.0.0 → v1.3.0)
- Triggers automatically when relevant — no command to remember
- Lifetime updates as the skill is refined further
More from AI Foundations
Generates optimised CLAUDE.md project files that configure Claude Code for your specific workflow.
Step-by-step guidance for connecting any MCP server to Claude Code.
Recommends the right MCP servers for your use case from the full registry.
Takes vague prompts and rewrites them into precise, high-performing ones using a 6-layer framework.
Build your own Claude Code skills from scratch with guided templates.
Design multi-step AI workflows that chain tools and skills together.
Browse the full library
297 skills across 31 categories. One purchase, lifetime updates.
See all bundles